|
July 14, 2005
Grants encourage 'sustainable' tech
By Robert Brumfield, Assistant Editor, eSchool News
Original source: http://www.eschoolnews.com
Outfitting a classroom with shiny new technology is great,
but if educators can't keep the equipment up to date, much
of the luster can be lost, and then students can become disheartened
and teachers discouraged. Now the technology director of a
regional service agency in Washington state has devised a low-cost
strategy intended to beat the predictable obsolescence that
often afflicts classroom technology.
The Sustainable Classroom Grant Project is meant to strike
a balance between the perennial budget concerns of public-school
educators and the swift pace of technological advancement by
creating a replicable model for the integration of classroom
technology that can remain viable beyond the three- to five-year
obsolescence cycle of most computers.
The initiative--funded at $8,400 per classroom--is the pet
project of Debbie Tschirgi, director of educational technology
for Vancouver-based Educational Service District 112, one of
nine regional service agencies serving Washington schools.
Her offices have partnered with vendors and local resellers
to design a classroom model that will be piloted in five classrooms
this fall.
Each of the five classrooms will be equipped with one computer
bought by the district; a SMART Board interactive whiteboard
and peripherals from SMART Technologies; a Hitachi CP-RS55
digital projector; a Califone Sound System; an AverVision 300
digital document camera; an Avocent Longview Wireless Extender
for the projector; an eInstruction wireless response system;
an annual subscription to eBoard, an online educational learning
environment; and other peripherals and software solutions that
are requested to ensure a successful implementation of the
project.
The companies whose products will be used in the pilot classrooms
already had won bids to provide technology to ESD 112's schools
and have "enthusiastically donated" products and
services to Tschirgi's project. Tschirgi also has set aside
some of her own department's funding to supplement the project
as needed.
Tschirgi is no newcomer to strategic thinking. In 1995--as
the technology boom was still in ascendancy--she wrote a grant
proposal to underwrite the development of high-tech classrooms
in which technology supported teaching and learning to meet
Washington's academic learning requirements. Her proposal was
funded.
"At the heart of that technology grant was the one-computer-to-every-four-students
ratio," Tschirgi said. "What we set out to prove
was that we could change classroom cultures by providing teachers
with high-quality professional development around best practices
and technological integration."
The name of the grant was TELDEC, an acronym for "Technology
and the Essential Learnings: Developing Effective Classrooms."
"We did the right thing; we proved that technology could
be used [to support] the curriculum [successfully]," Tschirgi
said. "But now we know that it was not the best thing:
It was not replicable. Districts without the funding couldn't
replicate the model, because of the high [degree] of classroom
access to technology. It was not replicable, and it was not
sustainable."
She added, "I'm hearing that some of the teachers who
were involved during those TELDEC years still have the same
equipment in their classrooms, because the districts don't
have the funds to replace [the equipment]."
Ten years later, many educators have come to believe that
technology plans with such high student-to-computer ratios
are expensive to deploy and fraught with difficulty from an
administrative point of view. Further difficulties arise when
the software becomes obsolete, or the machines begin to wear
out, or both.
"It now looks like a sustainable model that focuses on
one computer and a number of other technologies is what's needed
at this time," Tschirgi said.
The sustainable classroom plan is presented as an alternative
to more costly laptop and desktop programs designed to increase
the student-to-computer ratio. At the center of the plan is
a single computer that the teacher uses for instruction. The
supporting technology infrastructure provides permanent classroom
support for this computer at a one-time cost (or nearly so),
ideally through several PC obsolescence cycles. The combination
of a whiteboard, projector, sound system, and personal response
system makes up for the lack of individual computing devices
for students by allowing them to engage with the instructor,
the technology, and each other, while not leaving them huddled
around a single desktop PC four at a time.
With the ESD 112 plan, only one computer per classroom must
be replaced within the typical three- to five-year obsolescence
cycle. The sustainable classroom model depends largely on equipment
that need not be replaced in three to five years.
"In these ten years," Tschirgi said, "the definition
of technology has broadened. In 1995, technology meant 'computers.'
[Today,] technology has become ... a solution that fits a need."
The need, she said, remains the same: increased student achievement.
The holy book that her grantees will attempt to emulate is "A
Handbook for Classroom Instruction that Works," by Robert
Marzano.
"We will use those technologies to reinforce the proven
strategies from [Marzano's] book," said Tschirgi. "The
reason we chose that book is because there are a number of
districts in our region and state that are doing studies of
the book and the strategies in it that are proven to increase
student achievement."
Here are the strategies discussed in "Handbook":
- Identifying similarities and differences;
- Summarizing and note taking;
- Reinforcing effort and providing recognition;
- Homework and practice;
- Nonlinguistic representations;
- Cooperative learning;
- Setting objectives and providing feedback;
- Generating and testing hypotheses; and
- Questions, cues, and advance organizers.
Tschirgi said her grantees will metabolize those nine strategies
and use the technology to strengthen them. Grantees have
agreed to take part in web-based collaboration on how
they have used their classroom systems to achieve their
goals, and to develop best practices among themselves
and for the district's future use.
"As a teacher, very infrequently do you get together
and talk about what you're doing, what works for me, what worked
for my kids, et cetera," said Kristy Schneider, a sixth-grade
teacher of math, science, art, and reading, who was one of
the grant winners. "You [don't] get that time with other
teachers."
Another teacher taking part in the project, Jerri Ann Patten,
said she's also excited about how Tschirgi has chosen to run
the project.
"Debbie's running this a lot like action research--kind
of documenting the impact that technology is having on student
learning as we go," Patten said. "I like that."
Tim Fahlberg, a representative for eInstruction, which produces
the Classroom Performance System (CPS), a wireless classroom
response system that's being used in the pilot, described how
his company's technology relates to the outline in Marzano's
book.
"There's a huge piece of those nine principles that relate
to formative assessment: Get immediate feedback, and use that
to drive review," he said. "Our product provides
teachers with a relatively painless and engaging way to do
formative assessment. By putting CPS in the classroom, I can
get students to respond without embarrassing them and know
how the learning has gone."
The wireless eInstruction keypad system permits anonymous,
immediate student responses to teacher polls and allows educators
to view the success of any given lesson immediately. Its data-management
system also allows teachers to track student progress and performance
data against state standards.
Bob Berry, a representative from Troxell Communications, a
reseller that connected the district and many of the vendors
whose wares are being showcased through the Sustainable Classroom
Project, said the program will provide a much more effective
learning environment in general.
Ultimately, Tschirgi said, she hopes the project will "weave
seamlessly" into school improvement and building plans.
"We're developing these models that we hope will support
increased student learning in the classroom," she said. "We're
not saying that technology is going to increase student achievement.
We're saying that these teachers will use the instructional
strategies identified to increase student achievement--and
they'll use this technology wherever it fits."
July 14, 2005
Links:
ESD 112 Educational Technology Support Center
http://www.esd112.org/edtech
SMART Technologies Inc.
http://www.smarttech.com
AverMedia Technologies
http://www.aver.com
Califone International Inc.
http://www.califone.com
eInstruction Corp.
http://www.einstruction.com
Hitachi Global
http://www.hitachi.com
Troxell Communications Inc.
http://www.trox.com
|